Free curriculum designed for your growth in Christian thinking and living.
An introduction to the Christian worldview and the basic teachings of the Bible. Learn the basic differences among the main groups in the broad Christian tradition, and that “the Reformed faith” is just a nickname for the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Now available in iTunes.
An exposition of a most treasured summary of the Bible’s basic teachings. Learn how you can be clear about the glory of Christ in His triumph over our sinful misery, so that you can pass it down to the next generation.
Now available in iTunes.
So that everyone visiting this website and our churches knows exactly what we believe and teach, we state our faith right alongside historic and Reformed Christian churches.
The Ecumenical Creeds
Ancient summaries of basic Bible teachings written in part to defend God’s people against heresies sadly still alive today.
The Three Forms of Unity
500-year-old summaries of basic Bible teachings written in part to defend God’s people from deep-seated theological and moral corruption in all kinds of false churches and movements.
Biblical sermons by local URC ministers
Scriptural Sermons
Catechetical Sermons
More sermons »
7 comments so far
Dec 5, 2006Tom #
Perhaps one of the best critiques of theonomy I’ve heard. I plan to listen frequently.
Tom Skerritt,
Toronto, ON.
Mar 19, 2009Eric #
I am still a little confused when it comes to understanding both theonomy and/or natural law.
I understand the problems with theonomy, but what I don’t understand is why some would go so far and say that a vote against gay marriage is a theonomic stance. (Even though the state has no power to define marriage, they just want to think they do)
Can I argue the existence of God in the political world and still be able to consider myself a natural law type? I feel this is a key issue for me and many others. I feel that with the absence of God in the political world, there is no argument for peoples rights.
Mar 19, 2009Rev. John Sawtelle #
I don’t know that any of us said a vote against gay marriage is theonomic, perhaps you may be referring to someone else. One could vote against gay marriage for a host of reasons, not the least of reasons might include the one that says the government has no business licensing marriages at all.
The key issue in your gay marriage debate reference is that the government has no business defining a marriage. Marriages have always been defined and contracted within communities whether that be the family, the church, or some other religious order.
As for using rational arguments for the existence of God to in turn posit God as the basis for moral order in society, I don’t see a problem with that per say. The Declaration of Independence says that all men are endowed by their “Creator” with certain unalienable rights. In this very significant, national, founding document it sounds to me like, God is identified as the basis of human rights. So no, I don’t see a problem here. Obviously a number of other supplementing arguments and qualifications are going to be needed to clarify your position, but there does not seem to be anything inherently inconsistent with your commitment to a natural law-based political philosophy.
Apr 1, 2009Eric #
Thanks for the response.
I guess my main question is. Do we submit to the constitution? Or do we submit to the present state? I feel that the present state is very unconstitutional. Marriage licenses are in violation of article 1 section 10 of the constitution which says “No State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts.â€
Here is the next question. Am I sinning if I legally do not get a marriage license? Or am I sinning if I do?
Here is a great link on this topic from a lawyer in the 1800’s http://www.lysanderspooner.org/bib_new.htm
Thanks guys!
Apr 1, 2009Rev. John Sawtelle #
The answer is yes, we submit to the constitution and to the “present state” in all things lawful. As it stands, securing a license for marriage from the state is not something that is unlawful, that is, it is not something that violates any biblical principle.
Are you sinning if you don’t secure a marriage license from the state? Not necessarily, as long as you entered into a binding arrangement and had that contract properly solemnized. You would want to make sure the church was well aware of what you were doing and upon what grounds though. Beyond that, you might consider the fact that your actions, if misunderstood by others, might lead to bringing reproach upon the gospel; and, if you did not take great care to avoid that, your actions, though not sinful in and of themselves, would be sinful because of the consequences they led to.
On the whole, at this time in our nation’s history, the wisest course of action is for a believer to secure a marriage license from the state.
Hope that helps.
Feb 3, 2010Robert #
Very, very good. We have several people in our Reformed church who are into Vision Forum things which promote theonomy. How do you recommend we approach such people?
Feb 4, 2010Marchelle #
I am interested in your response to Robert re: Vision Forum. I do not consider myself to be a theonomist, yet I do appreciate many of VF’s products. As a homeschooling mom I have found much encouragement through some of their products.