Free curriculum designed for your growth in Christian thinking and living.
An introduction to the Christian worldview and the basic teachings of the Bible. Learn the basic differences among the main groups in the broad Christian tradition, and that “the Reformed faith” is just a nickname for the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Now available in iTunes.
An exposition of a most treasured summary of the Bible’s basic teachings. Learn how you can be clear about the glory of Christ in His triumph over our sinful misery, so that you can pass it down to the next generation.
Now available in iTunes.
So that everyone visiting this website and our churches knows exactly what we believe and teach, we state our faith right alongside historic and Reformed Christian churches.
The Ecumenical Creeds
Ancient summaries of basic Bible teachings written in part to defend God’s people against heresies sadly still alive today.
The Three Forms of Unity
500-year-old summaries of basic Bible teachings written in part to defend God’s people from deep-seated theological and moral corruption in all kinds of false churches and movements.
Biblical sermons by local URC ministers
Scriptural Sermons
Catechetical Sermons
More sermons »
2 comments so far
Dec 30, 2006Ryan Henderson #
Thank You!
Apr 25, 2007Rev. Adam Kaloostian #
[we recieved a great email from a listener. . .thanks to him for allowing us to post it here, and we’ll respond as soon as possible on this comment board]
From: Chris
Subject: Sabbath
Hello,
I have been listening to your series on the law of God, and I am having great difficulty understanding the fourth commandment. I cannot find any Reformed books or online articles arguing for the position maintained in these podcasts. As far as I can tell, nearly all the Reformed and Presbyterian theologians hold to the Presbyterian view as maintained in the WLC 117. They argue both that because the fourth commandment is part of the moral law, and because the sabbath is grounded in God’s creation and redemption, the sabbath is morally binding for the Christian today. I am aware that my quick summary does no justice to their arguments, but I am sure you are familiar with them. How do you answer these arguments? Can you help me to better understand, biblically, why the view expressed in HC 103 is correct, and that of the WLC is not? Is there a good book to which you can direct me that explains this?
Thank you.